Aixcel Labs · Agentic AI & LLM Systems Specialist

Five working creator systems. One governed delivery standard.

Aixcel Labs turns agentic AI architecture into inspectable public proof: typed contracts, deterministic gates, explicit agent state, evidence, approval, evaluation, replay, and deployment.

Direct answer

A production-minded agentic system is not a free-form conversation. It has typed inputs, bounded tools, durable state, measurable tests, observable failures, human authority, and a replay path when a provider is unavailable.

Public proof, not a slide-only claim.

Each system has a live deployment, source repository, typed API contract, Postman collection, evaluation fixtures, architecture diagrams, and a replay path.

Creator Campaign Command project visual01 · Verified public demo

Creator Campaign Command

Five bounded roles turn an objective and budget into a ranked creator plan, expose every decision, and stop before outreach or spend.

Measured proof: 5 graph roles, 3 scenario shapes, objective-sensitive ranking, 0 automatic external actions

Open live system →
Inspect repository →
Creator Campaign Proof Lab project visual02 · Verified public demo

Creator Campaign Proof Lab

A measurement council reconciles platform aggregates, separates observation from causality, and blocks claims without valid denominators or evidence.

Measured proof: 5 measurement roles, 3 data-quality scenarios, 4 attribution windows, 100% golden scenario evidence coverage

Open live system →
Inspect repository →
LanguageMix Studio project visual03 · Verified public demo

LanguageMix Studio

A timed script becomes culturally reviewed Urdu, Roman Urdu, or Arabic copy with distinct voice registers, safety flags, and native-language approval.

Measured proof: 3 source scenarios, 3 locale routes, 3 voice registers, 27 meaningful combinations

Open live system →
Inspect repository →
Agentic Systems Evaluation Lab project visual04 · Verified public demo

Agentic Systems Evaluation Lab

A live black-box evaluator probes deployed systems for contracts, evidence, approval gates, idempotency, boundaries, and latency, including labelled fault injection.

Measured proof: 3 target deployments, 7 weighted checks, 4 baseline and fault scenarios, arbitrary URLs blocked

Open live system →
Inspect repository →
Content Performance Forecaster project visual05 · Verified public demo

Content Performance Forecaster

A reproducible historical baseline returns forecast ranges, confidence, cohort fallback, and input sensitivity before a post is published.

Measured proof: 500 licensed public records, 400 training rows, 100 holdout rows, versioned ridge models

Open live system →
Inspect repository →

The stack matches each control boundary.

Graph orchestration is used where state and branching matter. Deterministic code owns scoring, evidence rules, limits, and safety gates. Human authority remains visible.

01

Runtime and contracts

Python 3.12, FastAPI, Pydantic v2, REST, generated OpenAPI, and LangGraph for the campaign decision graph.

02

Decision systems

Objective-sensitive ranking, attribution assumptions, locale and register controls, model ranges, idempotency, replay, and explicit approval states.

03

Verification and operations

Pytest, Postman collections, Playwright, GitHub Actions, Vercel, X-Trace-ID headers, structured JSON logs, and black-box evaluation.

Production-shaped proof with honest boundaries.

The live portfolio uses synthetic or licensed public records and performs no client-system mutation. It demonstrates architecture and behavior, not client production acceptance.

Controls change outcomes

Objectives alter creator ranking, attribution windows alter calculated outcomes, language and tone alter reviewed copy, faults alter evaluation scores, and content inputs alter forecast ranges.

Every run is inspectable

Responses expose typed state, traces, evidence, assumptions, limits, approval state, latency, usage, and a request trace ID.

No invented production claim

Green CI, a live URL, or a score of 100 proves the tested portfolio artifact only. Real integration still needs private data review, staging UAT, named owners, rollback, and cost approval.

No framework theatre

LangChain, CrewAI, MCP, a vector database, and Kubernetes remain outside a project unless the real data flow needs them and their operation can be demonstrated.

Continue your evaluation.

Compare adjacent systems, inspect evidence, or see how Aixcel delivers the work.

Bring us the constraint. Leave with a clearer next move.

In 25 focused minutes, we will map where work or revenue is getting stuck, test whether AI is the right intervention, and identify the highest leverage first step.

Book a free systems audit