The work this solves.
A workflow contains more than visible steps. Timing, credentials, data formats, retries, and exception ownership can all change during a migration. A direct visual copy can hide those differences.
What the project can include.
AiXCEL connects the business workflow to the implementation. We agree on the first useful outcome before expanding the scope.
- An inventory of workflows, dependencies, and owners
- A grouping of shared integration and transformation patterns
- A bounded migration batch and representative fixtures
- Behavior checks, a cutover plan, and a rollback path
- Runbooks and handover for the destination platform
The checks matter.
Acceptance is based on the agreed workflow. Useful tests include:
- Replay the same input against the original and migrated workflow.
- Compare error handling as well as successful output.
- Verify that only one workflow owns external writes during cutover.
A sensible first scope.
Migrate a representative batch before estimating or switching the rest of the estate.
Who this fits.
Teams moving a known collection of workflows between automation platforms.
What happens before you quote?
We review the workflow, its owners, the tools involved, and the access needed. The proposal defines the scope, assumptions, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria.
Do we have to replace our current tools?
Often the first improvement can use existing platforms and APIs. Tool changes are considered when the current setup cannot meet the agreed requirements.
What happens after handover?
Documentation and an operating checklist are part of the agreed delivery. Ongoing monitoring, improvements, and support are scoped separately.
Can the AI send messages or change records on its own?
External actions need explicit authorization and tested rules. Drafting, review, and execution are separate steps when the decision has consequences.