Case study · automation architecture
A migration factory—not 108 copied workflows.
Automation candidates were inventoried, grouped into reusable families, and designed for behaviour parity so a Make-to-n8n migration could be governed and tested.
The migration-factory approach treats a large automation move as a repeatable engineering system: inventory, classification, target patterns, shared components, parity tests, release gates, exception handling, and operational handover.
Case-study figures describe this documented engagement and are not forecasts or guarantees.
The operating constraint
A direct one-for-one rebuild would have repeated logic, inconsistent quality, weak traceability, and an expensive test burden across a large scenario estate.
The system Aixcel designed
The architecture grouped scenarios into reusable families, defined target n8n patterns, behaviour-parity requirements, QA gates, shared services, and a controlled migration sequence.
The documented result
The documented scope covered 108 migration candidates and established a governable route to implementation. Aixcel does not present the scope count as a completed-migration or outcome claim.
System components
Make, n8n, workflow inventory, reusable architecture, parity testing, QA gates
How to interpret this evidence.
Names and sensitive details are withheld. Metrics retain their stated meaning and evidence label. A scope count is not converted into an outcome, and no engagement result is presented as a universal benchmark.
Continue your evaluation.
Compare adjacent systems, inspect evidence, or see how Aixcel delivers the work.
Bring us the constraint. Leave with a clearer next move.
In 25 focused minutes, we will map where work or revenue is getting stuck, test whether AI is the right intervention, and identify the highest-leverage first step.
Book a free systems audit